NARRG’s Pledge of Intent

NARRG’s Pledge of Intent

Our Vision for the Management of the National Alliance



At this point in our mission to restore the National Alliance, it is time for NARRG to share some thoughts about our vision of the necessary changes needed for the eventual governance of the NA corporate structure, and the overwhelming need to overhaul its membership criteria.

We are well into this legal process now and what we have seen thus far is very much encouraging; so much so that we’ve been thinking about a vision of the future management of the National Alliance and therefore want to share some of those thoughts and ideas with you. With a successful conclusion of this legal action, we must be prepared for the next steps in the recovery of the organization.

The following should be considered simply as a conceptual framework for the future agreed upon by the entire NARRG team. We absolutely must, upon taking up management of the National Alliance, make essential changes to the corporate structure and membership. We must never again put the organization into the jeopardy in which it has found itself after the death of Dr. Pierce.

While there aren’t any known extraordinary persons available with the ability and integrity of a Dr. Pierce to give complete command to, there are nonetheless good quality people available to select from for the various management posts, as well as for the chairman’s position.

We must learn from our experiences, adapt to the realities and create a new paradigm from which to build and thus guarantee the organization a succession of qualified leadership for generations to come.

We propose in the following paragraphs basic concepts to the structure of governing the corporation that will effectively prohibit any individual(s) who prove to demonstrate questionable ability or lack of character that could harm the National Alliance, from becoming a member, much less a leader. The first line of defense is a proper membership program.

For the organization to be managed successfully, we need to make the necessary changes. Thus continue reading the initial framework we envision. Keep in mind that this is similar to the initial member’s book published in 1981, and that this is by no means comprehensive, but in a process of evolutionary development.

Corporate Property & Assets

1. Our intent is to operate and manage the National Alliance in a professional manner and grow the organization and its related businesses through accepted Good Corporate Business Practices and in conformance with laws relating to its incorporation.

2. We intend to operate from the central office of the National Alliance, the home of Dr. Pierce obtained for us at Mill Point, WV. Therefore we intend to staff this facility and refurbish it to acceptable operating standards. Dr. Pierce referred to our home as The Land.

Once the national office administrative building and minimal housing are in working order, the person appointed as chairman of the organization must live and work from the national office property. Other staff will be added as we are able to accommodate.

3As a consequence we have no intention to sell the national office property nor any portion thereof.

4. Furthermore we will not sell any National Alliance special assets, whether it be Dr. Pierce’s library, his firearms, the NA organizational library or any artifacts or personal possessions of his, nor any other items of historic value such as artifacts and possessions of Commander George Lincoln Rockwell and Robert Mathews owned by the Alliance.

Unfortunately, many items of our history and other valuable artifacts have already been sold off by Erich Gliebe to various individuals, including Will Williams and John McLaughlin; another Gliebe associate and new Board of Directors member under the current management, in addition to Gliebe’s close personal friend Jayne Cartwright who also serves as Secretary under Will Williams.

All items of this type must be preserved in a protected state in an organizational museum to be housed within the Dr. William L. Pierce Memorial Hall. We pledge in the course of this lawsuit to pursue legal process, in order to obtain full recovery of these items.

We should mention also that the Resistance record company is also an item of the present litigation.

5. All property and assets of the National Alliance will belong to the company or related business enterprise(s), and will not be the domain of anyone’s private ownership, no matter what their position is within the organization. The National Alliance being a corporation belongs to and is responsible to its membership.

6. We pledge to begin anew the development of the Dr. Pierce Memorial Garden left abandoned years ago, as well as the continuance of improvements and initiation of new projects as we are able. Initially of course the first priorities must and will be basic operating facilities.

Organizational Structure

1. Initially, the National Alliance will be managed by a newly appointed Board of Directors. Some of these directors may come from the litigant team, but the formation will not be limited to those people. There are other members who make up a larger auxiliary support group of the litigant team who would also make good candidates for board positions. Some of these people have been members of the National Alliance since the 1970’s and ’80’s. It will be the responsibility of the Board to select replacement members.

2. The Board of Directors will be made up of at least 5 members who will select a chairman who will not occupy a seat on the Board. The chairman will be responsible to the Board of Directors, and will serve a standard set term of office, which can be renewed concurrently through the Board’s agreement. Theoretically there is no limit to the renewals, if the chairman performs his duty to the satisfaction of the Board. Otherwise the Board may upon conclusion of the term or in an emergency session, select a replacement.

3. The purpose of the chairman’s office will be to guide and direct the activities of the organization. The chairman will be given wide latitude for the execution of his duties and responsibilities. His role therefore carries with it a great amount of authority.

However, the chairman’s activities are to be transparent always to the Board of Directors whose job is to safe guard the organization’s assets, and to ensure that anything the chairman may wish to do that involves major financing, or affects corporate assets, or anything else that is of extraordinary or exceptional nature will need a convening of the Board for recorded discussion and agreement first. Only then will the chairman be duly authorized to proceed forward with those proposed actions.

Simply put, the chairman of the National Alliance becomes responsible for his actions to the Board of Directors, and there will no longer be such a thing as perpetual chairmanship for life, without concurrent periodic approval of the Board of Directors. Consequently, the chairman may no longer do as he wishes with company property, and use assets as if they were his own, answering to no one.

If we are one day fortunate enough to have a man of the caliber of a Dr. Pierce or a George Lincoln Rockwell among us, only then we can once again put full faith and authority to the command of such an exemplary person.

Our system of process will ensure that the best we have will lead and anyone who proves deficient can and will be replaced.

(& supporters)

1.Membership will be vastly overhauled. There will no longer be a process of simply down-loading and filling out a basic application and sending in $20.00, and you’re considered a member.

This process will be one that will allow the new person to introduce themselves as a supporter only, with no rights or privileges of membership. This will be the pathway to membership if the supporter aspires to achieve it.

A supporter of the National Alliance has no obligation whatsoever other than fulfillment of their pledge of financial support.

A supporter who wishes to become more closely associated with the National Alliance and eventually become a member must remain in good standing, demonstrate commitment and be well known to the national office for a time period of at least a minimum of one year, but otherwise generally a 2 year or more period.

The potential member must be invited by the national office to apply for membership or otherwise be recommended for membership by an existing member who has been in good standing for at least one year. The new applicant is therefore sponsored by an existing member who thus puts their own judgment to test by their sponsorship.

Such aspirants will be required to submit a detailed application as well as a background check, and demonstrate their ideological understanding of our worldview and its application to current events and history.

By the time a prospective member reaches this stage he or she will have already well demonstrated in one manner or another or in multiple ways their commitment to furthering the National Alliance message amongst our people.

Members who will have obligations and responsibilities to the National Alliance they must uphold, will also have the privileges of membership that distinctly elevates them above the role of supporters.

It goes without saying that we will not allow into membership anyone who has a history of mental health or psychological issues, alcohol and drug addictions, non-White dependents and most felony criminal convictions, including sex crimes. Nor will we accept homosexuals. This list is not inclusive, but given as examples.

We must tighten up criteria for membership. Doing so will provide us with people that will be assets to the National Alliance instead of liabilities. We will not allow anyone to bring drama and division into the organization. We want our National Alliance to be representative of the best of our people, not the worst.

2. As in the past, potential recruits will not be turned away because of religious belief or lack of it. The National Alliance is not a religious organization although certainly its mission does contain an important spiritual element. What is asked of every member is that the mission and philosophy of the National Alliance, that of preserving and advancing our race, represents  eminent importance in that individual’s personal life.

Cosmotheism in Context

Having stated that the mission and philosophy of the National Alliance is that of preserving and advancing our race, the National Alliance will be republishing Dr. Pierce’s essays on Cosmotheism. Those essays will be available to anyone who wishes to reflect further on our Founder’s early thoughts and writings on the subject, from the ten year period from the mid-’70’s to the mid-’80’s.

As everyone knows, Dr. Pierce let these ideas go fallow after the mid-1980’s for various reasons. What was most important to him, especially in his later years, was the development of the National Alliance as a secular organization; a movement, a real national alliance.  Nonetheless, there are important uplifting concepts imparted in these writings and we’d like them to continue to be available.

As evidence of these intentions we exhibit below from court documents, the testimony of Will Williams in a notarized, sworn affidavit given in 2005 about his experiences as a national office staff member from 1992 to 1993.

We thank Will Williams for his testimony, as his eyewitness account proves what the status of Cosmotheism with Dr. Pierce was during the time he spent working at the office with him. There are many other members out there that can attest the same sentiment as stated by Williams. The fact that this particular statement is in legal form makes it exceptional to demonstrate our point. 

Therefore keeping this idea in its proper context within the National Alliance is just as important to us today, as it is stated here by Will Williams in 2005.

Click on each of the three icons below in succession to review Will Williams’s sworn statement.

  1. William’s action reminds me of these words:

    “Merit and fortune interweave as one;
    These fools don’t know it. If they ever were
    To find the famous Philosopher Stone,
    They’d have a stone but no philosopher.”
    Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

    What Goethe is trying to say is this: That the bad can possess the good, but only the good can convey the good.

    Let us not make the same mistake…

  2. Williams just arrested for assault ?

    • Yes, Will Williams was arrested on Thursday, December 16 in West Virginia by the Pocahontas County WV Sheriff’s Dept. according to the documents of the Magistrate Court of Pocahontas County WV. He is charged with battery of a woman who was in his employment. According to the police report, he had physically attacked the woman and was choking her. Another male employee at the scene pulled Williams off of the woman. The male employee has corroborated the woman’s story in the police report. Williams was sent to the county jail but can be released until trial time upon posting $1,000 cash bail. If convicted at trial, Williams can be sentenced to up to 1 year incarceration and fine.

      This is development is not at all surprising to us, nor should it be to anyone. It is just another reason among many that this new Williams/Strom regime given over to him by Erich Gliebe must go. A professional management team must be put into place that will uphold good corporate business practices & ethics and whose officers are far above such criminal behavior.

      A post on this subject coming soon.

  3. I really hope we can win back the Name, the Land, the Member’s handbook… I still have my handbook from 2000, I believe? I was a one man army of activism for the NA and so badly hope to be once more. I still am a “boots on the ground” activist but it’s just not the same. Nothing made me happier than getting my boxes from Natvan in the mail!! Hail NARRG, Hail Victory!

  4. This information is so heartening to me! I am so over joyed that AFP highlighted the NARRG in their latest issue and led me to this webpage. As a long time separatist, the outline for the new NA and the massive overhauling and attempts to retain and repossess our collective artifacts, of our past leaders, is such positive news. I wish the best of luck in these endeavors.

    I (once upon a time) was a short time member of the NSM and found most of its membership to be quite ill fitting and their approach to be very brutish and outdated. This in addition, due to its ‘appearance’, attracted many deviant and artificially racialist folks. The fact that the new NA stresses quality over quantity, unlike most so called eurocentric nationalist organizations, will hopefully draw in a more stable and productive membership – one in which will harken a new dawn for volk. I truly hope the new NA can attain normal citizens whom contribute to society, and not the hateful criminal elements often associated with such movements.

    I am currently working towards my M.B.A. in Strategy and have immense potential to influence and enlighten our youth (as I am a youngster myself; 28).

    For Family, Folk, and Country – to Victory!
    D.R. Drago

    • Donnie,

      Thanks for your kind and supportive comments. For the benefit of our readers I’d like to point out that the “AFP” you refer to is the American Free Press newspaper.

      Indeed our vision for the National Alliance is to primarily recruit from the professionals, which with your educational goals is where you most likely fit in and also from the working class family people. Included with both of these groups we must especially focus on attracting the young folks like yourself.

      A movement cannot be maintained, sustained or grow without increasing numbers of the young. An organization consisting mostly of old men can only demonstrate decay; not Life. We are very fortunate to have many young people like yourself supporting our mission for a fresh, new approach to declaring a New Era for the National Alliance.

  5. Hopefully you can wrest control of the National Alliance and put your propositions into practice. I am particularly impressed with the distinction made between members and supporters, a policy that will go a long way in protecting the organisation from ye usual suspects.

  6. Let us hope for a NARRG victory. But in the event the legal battlefield goes against us, as they often can, will the NAARG work to launch its own organization? I think knowing that this is not an all-or-nothing battle will serve to give every supporter here that nothing will stop the NARRG from establishing an organization, even a negative court ruling.

    Will the NARRG live, no matter what?

    • Jake,

      Although the court system is terribly slow and we see the defendants using every trick they can muster to avoid the courts instructions, the bottom line is that they cannot play the avoidance game for much longer. Eventually they will have to do what they have been instructed to do. Compliance to court orders are mandatory. Recently members of the NARRG team have been approached several times by Erich Gliebe directly or through surrogates to drop the lawsuit and in one instance we were even publicly threatened by Will Williams on a forum via his posting of his privately sent e-mail to one of our team members. That communication was forwarded onto our attorney for file.

      The defendants are well aware of the proper procedure to communicate any offers of settlement through our attorney. Their messages and threats to various team members are simply a way to try to cause defections from the team and to cause fear. They are attempting at playing a psychological game of “Good cop Gliebe & Bad cop Williams”. The team is not going to buckle under intimidation. As a matter of fact, it only strengthens our resolve. The NARRG team remains united and more determined than ever.

      Although the pace of the case is slowly moving forward, we are nonetheless very much encouraged by what has transpired thus far concerning court rulings and instructions to the defendants. We are even more encouraged by the reactions of the defendants. It would seem that there is an air of desperation dispersed amongst them. We are feeling confident that we are moving in the right direction and that it will come to a successful conclusion for our side. That is why we wanted to announce some of the team’s thoughts on moving forward with conceptual ideas about organizational structure & membership once we are legally put in charge to form a new management team.

      The short side of an answer to your question is that, yes, you’re certainly right, there aren’t any guarantees in any case. But as we’re feeling very confident that we are going to prevail, the answer is that we think that it is the other side that needs to be thinking about making alternative plans much more so than we need to. But no matter what happens, Jake, yes certainly we must find a way to continue on working for the preservation and advancement of our people. This Idea will find a way to proper expression for we are all good people, professional and working class. For those of us who support NARGG, who lived and worked for the National Alliance for these many years, this Idea is a principle rationale for our existence. In other words, like like Dr. Pierce said, “It is Our Purpose.” However, a properly run National Alliance is the vehicle to deliver this Idea and we’re going all out to get it!

  7. As a NARRG supporter, I’m heartened by the careful thought and effort the team is putting into planning for the future of the organization. Every step must be taken to attract and recruit the best people, who hold foremost in their hearts and minds the advancement of the White Race on all fronts. I’m glad the team realizes that dwelling on things like interpersonal drama and religious or ideological differences will never produce anything of value. It’s way past time for awake White men and women to realize that if we can find the trust and courage to stand together, there is really no limit to the great things we can achieve.


Leave a Comment